The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below (one year of suspended sentence in four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are circumstances that may be considered in light of the circumstances, such as the time when the defendant committed the instant crime, the fact that the defendant was divided, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment, the defendant lending the name of the head of the instant sexual traffic business establishment and the lessee of the business establishment, the act of arranging sexual traffic is highly harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and impairing sound sexual culture and good morals, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the decision of the court below, and other circumstances that are the conditions for the sentencing specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the period of the instant business, the size and form of the business, the degree of participation, and the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is determined within reasonable and appropriate scope, and it is not determined that the sentencing

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.