logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1981. 6. 9. 선고 80다417 판결
[손해배상][집29(2)민,78;공1981.8.1.(661) 14051]
Main Issues

Where the obligation to cancel the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the buyer and the seller becomes final and conclusive in the lawsuit claiming the cancellation of the original owner, the time to calculate the amount of damages incurred by the seller's impossibility

Summary of Judgment

If the obligation to cancel the ownership transfer registration of the sale real estate in the name of the seller and the buyer is finalized in the lawsuit claiming the cancellation registration procedure of the original owner, the calculation of the damages due to the seller's failure to perform the procedure shall be based on the time when the loss is finalized, and shall not be based on the time of cancellation of

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 569 and 570 of the Civil Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 72Da2207 delivered on March 13, 1973, 75Da21 delivered on May 13, 1975, and 76Da2414 delivered on November 22, 1977

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff 1 et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant-appellee

Defendant-Appellee

Yang-gun Agricultural Cooperatives (Attorney Lee Jae-soo et al., Counsel for defendant-appellee)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 79Na1409 delivered on February 4, 1980

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The plaintiffs' grounds of appeal are examined.

If a lawsuit claiming the cancellation of a seller's registration of ownership transfer of a real estate for the purpose of sale becomes final and conclusive as a loss of a seller, the seller's performance of registration of ownership transfer of the real estate against the buyer was impossible under the concept of social transaction. In this case, the seller's assessment of damages amount should be based on the time when the loss is determined (see Supreme Court Decisions 72Da2207, Mar. 13, 1973; 75Da21, May 13, 1975; 76Da2414, Nov. 22, 1977). Thus, the court below's judgment to the effect that a lawsuit claiming the cancellation of ownership transfer registration of the last registered titleholder against the buyer cannot be determined at the time when a lawsuit claiming performance registration of ownership transfer cannot be executed yet by a final and conclusive judgment against the former registered titleholder, or that it cannot be determined at the time when a lawsuit claiming performance registration of right cannot be executed by a final and conclusive judgment against the latter registered titleholder.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Shin Jong-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1980.2.4.선고 79나1409
참조조문
기타문서