1. As to the case on May 8, 2019 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s motion revocation of the disposition in January 201.

. The consent was given.

Accordingly, on November 30, 2018, the president of the Duniversity requested the chairperson of the Intervenor to take disciplinary action against the Plaintiff. On December 20, 2018, the intervenor held a temporary directors' meeting on December 20, 2018 and decided to demand heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff. On December 24, 2018, the president requested the teachers' disciplinary committee to adopt a resolution on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff.

1. From May 8, 2018 to May 14, 2018, the Plaintiff submitted a leave from May 14, 2018, and the actual period of stay in a foreign country entered May 19, 2018 (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”). 2. On May 15, 2018, May 17, 2018, the Plaintiff provided a child language education or a child language education curriculum, which is the Plaintiff’s subject of education, but did not attend the class but did not attend the class (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 2”; hereinafter “instant Disciplinary Reason 1”) and conducted the class in the special course of outside experts without attending the class (hereinafter “each Disciplinary Reason 1”) (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s language education curriculum No. 15-18, May 17, 2015”).

D. On December 24, 2018, the Intervenor requested the Plaintiff to decide on a disciplinary action, and notified the Plaintiff of the grounds for the instant disciplinary action and the attendance of the respective disciplinary committee.

E. On January 4, 2019, the teachers’ disciplinary committee decided on the Plaintiff to take one-month disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for each of the instant disciplinary reasons (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).

On January 22, 2019, an intervenor took a disciplinary measure for reduction of salary for one month of salary reduction according to the above disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff.

(F) On February 20, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Defendant seeking the revocation of the instant disciplinary action, but the Defendant did not recognize the grounds for the second disciplinary action on May 8, 2019, but the grounds for the first disciplinary action are not recognized.