1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justified even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is based on the evidence submitted to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the lower court as to the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the amendment as follows: (a) the amendment is made as to the instant case; and (b) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The revised part 2 pages 6 of this case’s records are as follows: “each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 9 through 13”.

2. On the 7th page, the fact that “the amount of the price for the goods that the Plaintiff asserts is not consistent is that the Defendant was supplied with the goods from the Plaintiff, and there seems to have been some defective goods, and that the Plaintiff paid the remainder of the price for the goods other than the defective goods.”

In view of the two pages 10 points, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff or did not return the goods, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

2. From 10 to 13, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant committed a tort such as fraud or good faith, and that the machinery repair cost incurred by the Plaintiff was caused by the above Defendant’s tort.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.