1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from August 27, 2012 to April 30, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a three-born female, and the Defendant is a doctor operating the “D Council member.”

나. 피고는 2012. 8. 27. 원고에게 수면 대장내시경 시술을 하면서 대장용종 절제처치를 하다가 좌측 하복부의 에스상결장(S狀結腸) 천공을 발생시킨 후 원고를 가톨릭대학교 서울성모병원(이하 ‘서울성모병원’이라 한다)으로 전원시켰으며, 원고는 범복막염 소견을 보였다.

C. The Plaintiff from August 27, 2012 to the same year

9. The same year as that of a person hospitalized in the Seoul Exemplary Hospital by no later than 15.

8. On 27. 27. The same year for the treatment of a serious patient room, setting up the ceiling of work, preventing a tent by setting up the ceiling, and attaching an artificial smoking machine due to waste collection and illicit beer, after being treated as a serious patient room;

8. 30. He received 30. The plaintiff's serious inflows caused by the moving operation on the lower right side of the plaintiff, not on the upper right side of the said tent.

At the same hospital, the Plaintiff received a correction operation on November of the same year, and on May of 2013, the Plaintiff received a correction operation due to the anti-salking of the euperum.

From August 27, 2012 to November 30, 2012, the Defendant spent KRW 16,755,970 in total for the Plaintiff’s medical expenses for Seoul Sung-si Hospital, care loan fees for patients, medical appliances, home nurse’s remuneration, nursing staff’s remuneration, etc.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1-2-3, Eul 1-14, the result of physical appraisal commission, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of the above recognition of negligence in medical treatment, in light of the ordinary person's common sense, the defendant seems to have caused the plaintiff to have breached his duty of care in medical treatment, and thus, it can be presumed that the defendant was negligent in medical treatment.

(See Supreme Court Decision 93Da52402 delivered on February 10, 1995). As to this, the Defendant is extremely scisfying in the scisfy that the scisfy in which the astronomical rice was created, when the scisfying medical personnel deeply engaged in the scisfying of the master.