(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017나32007

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017나32007

손해배상

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Even if the allegations by the parties concerned and the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are closely examined, it does not seem that there was any error in the findings and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court, each “Defendant A” shall be both “A” and each “Defendant B” shall be both “Defendant A”.

Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant B”) shall be put into “Defendant B” in two to three pages of the judgment of the first instance court.

The third six pages of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "Fence of February 13, 2015" and "from February 13, 2015 to April 24, 2015."

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be 17 as follows.

2. The five pages 5 of the judgment of the first instance court of "the establishment of tort liability A" shall be followed as follows.

[3. Whether the Defendant’s employer liability is established or not] Nos. 6-5 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court, “The Plaintiff issued a tax invoice in the name of Defendant B” with “the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice to the Defendant.”

The 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be subject to the "this judgment" in the 17th judgment.

Part VII through 8 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deleted from 7.20 to 8.3.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant against the defendant shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.14 2017나4675

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.12 2017나20479

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2017나17466

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.04 2016나3613

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.03 2017나13709