logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.27 2015나2017881
가설재 임대료 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the witness D's testimony is deemed to be "each video, witness E and D's testimony," and the "10,000,000 won" as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the witness D's testimony of the court of first instance is deemed to be "each video, witness E and D's testimony," and the "10,000,000 won" as stated in the second sentence of Article 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow