logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.04 2018나2004558
해고무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the entry of this case by the court in this case are as follows: (a) the “the same date” under Article 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the same date” under Article 4, Section 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the situation is”; (b) the “the testimony of the witness J” under Article 7, Section 2 as “the testimony of the witness J and the witness of the court of first instance”; and (c) the “the testimony of the witness J” under Article 12, Section 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the testimony of the witness J and the witness of the court of first instance”; and (d) the voluntary agreement between executives and employees (Evidence 16-1 of the evidence No. 16-1 of the above agreement) was not implemented; and (e) the total amount of piece rates applied to the officers and employees under Article 2, Section 1,2 of

In addition to "each dismissal, it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the first instance court, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow