beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s transfer disposition against the Plaintiff on April 14, 2016 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, the aggressor student, and E, F, G, and H (hereinafter “victims”) were students enrolled in the second grade of D Middle School from December 2015 to March 2016, and thereafter the Plaintiff was transferred to I Middle School on May 20, 2016.
B. On March 30, 2016, E reported the Plaintiff’s school violence to D middle school teachers, and the Autonomous Committee for Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “Autonomous Committee”) notified the Plaintiff, his father B, and his mother C of the attendance of the autonomous committee to state their opinions on school violence cases reported pursuant to Article 17 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”).
C. On April 12, 2016, the autonomous committee held a meeting on the following agenda (hereinafter “each of the instant school violence”) and decided to order the Plaintiff to take a special education course for three (3) days (15) of the Plaintiff’s special education course, and five (5) hours of the special education course (Article 17(1)8, (3), and (9) of the School Violence Prevention Act.
In December 2015, the Plaintiff’s severe harassment began, and F was forced to do so by a female son who does not refuse to do so, but was forced to do so by a female son who does not refuse to do so, but did not forced the Plaintiff to do so, and forced the Plaintiff to do so by cut off the scam and transmit the scams. In other words, the Plaintiff et al., et al., and the four children et al. were forced to do so, and H forced the scam to have the scam by cutting off the scams with the Plaintiff and four children, and H had the Plaintiff scamd with the Plaintiff during the riding machine. In the end, the Plaintiff scambling that the scam was caused by the Plaintiff’s interference and that the scambling was not caused.
b. E forced four children in the same four names, each of whom is forced to be 5,000 won, and paid money to three children, and the Plaintiff is one.