logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.01 2018고단2198
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From around 00:20 on May 12, 2018 to 00:35 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) boarded-gu, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, to a taxi operated by the victim C (66 years of age) in the Guro-gu, Seoul; (b) moved to a restaurant located in D; (c) while having a dispute with the victim with the victim with respect to the cambling in the taxi, the Defendant told the victim, who was on his/her own operation, called “stopping a taxi as soon as possible”; and (d) when the victim, who was on his/her own operation, was able to buy a taxi with his/her breast and sell it.

Therefore, even though the victim set the taxi, the victim was the victim of the vehicle who continued to make the 112 return on the 112th day before the just day of drinking and launching.

The Defendant committed assault against the victim, who was able to have the victim unable to flee, such as drinking the victim's chest and arms when drinking.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same date and time as the preceding paragraph, and at a place where 112 was reported and sent, G police officers G belonging to the Seoul Gangnam Police Station F District would have caused a defect in guiding the compensation for damages, thereby keeping G’s hand, etc. and pushed off G’s body.

Accordingly, the police officer of the same district group called together with the police officer's body was tightly sealed by his body in order to photograph H with a mobile phone, and h's body was tightly pushed by her hand once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on closure photographs;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the occupation of a driver's assault) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act:

arrow