(영문) 부산고등법원 2019.05.16 2018나56032

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산고등법원 2019.05.16 2018나56032

계약효력부존재 확인

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and the defendant’s new or new argument that this court has concluded again or is going to go through by the court is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment identical to the following

2. The letter "19" in the 6th 7th 7th 7th 6th 7th 7th scoping or adding shall be read as "19,20 (including paper numbers)", and "Witness D" shall be read as "Witness D of the first instance trial."

6. 6. 6. 14. The “L” shall be raised to “A”.

7.13. The following shall be added to 13 pages:

No. 55 square meters in Seo-gu in Busan, Seo-gu, the Defendant purchased a project site in this case, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership from a large number of creditors, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership from a large number of creditors, and there is no data that the execution of each of the above provisional seizure was revoked even after the notification of termination of this case.

3. The further determination of this Court

A. The defendant's argument that the reason for termination of the contract for the plaintiff's assertion is due to the plaintiff's personal deviation from the former representative director I, etc. and is irrelevant to the defendant's service contents, and thus, it cannot be the reason for termination of

B. The Defendant purchased land included in the instant project site and completed the registration of ownership transfer in its name, and sold 1/100 of each of the land owned by the Defendant to Nonparty G and completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 1, 2016. At the time, the Defendant’s representative director I changed the key of the Housing Public Relations Center to promote the instant project and obstructed the Plaintiff’s business by preventing the Plaintiff’s entry by changing the entrance number of the entrance around July 2016.

Furthermore, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 9, 19, 20 and Eul evidence Nos. 4 are as follows.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-부산고등법원 2018.10.25 2016나58638

-부산고등법원(창원) 2019.01.10 2018나11896

-부산지방법원 2018.06.15 2017나51341

-부산고등법원 2019.07.25 2018나54388

-대전고등법원 2019.05.30 2019나10178