logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.06.15 2017나51341
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows 2. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Each description of "A through 10, 14 (including paper numbers)," written on 3 pages 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be written with "A through 10, 14 (including paper numbers), and No. 7" written on 1 to 10, 14, and 7.

The 17th letter of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: "Chographs 7, 16, 20, and 4 (including paper numbers), 17, 21 through 23 (including paper numbers)" of the 17th letter of "Chographs 7, 16, 20 (including paper numbers), 4, 6, 17, 21 through 23, 15, 16, 15, 16, 17, 17, 21 through 23, 15, and 16."

The 5th page 16 of the first instance judgment "the 2nd building of this case" shall be changed to "the 2nd floor of this case".

On the 6th page of the first instance judgment, "However, as seen in the same facts and the above facts recognized," shall be added to "However, as seen in the above facts recognized."

Since the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be a serious reason, the plaintiff's refusal of renewal is deemed to be legitimate, as the plaintiff's refusal of renewal is deemed to be a serious reason, pursuant to Article 10 (1) 8 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act, the plaintiff may refuse the defendant's request for renewal. Therefore, the plaintiff's refusal of renewal of the lease contract is lawful.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow