A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for fraud, etc., and on December 1, 2017, the judgment became final and conclusive on December 1, 2017.

The defendant is a foreigner of the nationality of the so-called telephone financial fraud (tentatively called phishing) organization that obtains money by deceiving an unspecified number of people by means of money transfer to the nominal passbook account by falsely pretending to the effect that he/she was involved in a fraudulent case by misrepresenting the prosecutor, bond company, loan company's staff, etc., or by kidnapping his/her family members.

Around June 2017, the Defendant and his name-free staff member (the responsibility to receive cash) entered Korea from the other name-free boxes (the total responsibility) which are the Malaysia organization of the Malaysia, and he received and delivered the money by other organization members through the Malaysia to other organization members. The Defendant and his name-free staff (the responsibility to receive cash) received the money through the Malaysia and conspired in sequence with the above staff members to act as the responsibility to receive cash.

On June 28, 2017, the full liability of the above name is to leave the victim C by telephone at a place where it is not possible to pay money to the victim C.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, there was no fact that the victim's gross responsibility for the failure of the above name was kidnapped by his or her father.

Nevertheless, as above, the above-mentioned general responsibility for the unwritten statement is that the victim deceivings the victim and caused the victim to withdraw 40 million won from the bank account in the name of the victim at the port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of the victim of deposit of KRW 40 million, and the defendant was bound to receive KRW 30 million from the victim's cash of KRW 14:0,000 from the victim's cash in the same place of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port of port

Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to the above name.