beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
위 챗 닉네임 ‘D’ 을 사용하는 성명 불 상의 보이스 피 싱 총책은 성명 불상의 전화 유인책, 카드 모집 책, 피해 금 인출 책 등과 순차 공모하여, 불상의 방법으로 알게 된 피해자들의 전화번호로 전화를 걸어 자식 납치, 대출업자 사칭 등으로 기망하여 돈을 송금하게 하는 속칭 보이스 피싱의 방법으로 다른 사람들의 돈을 편취하기로 하였다.
The Defendants, under the employment of the above nameless Boscing scam scam scam, were waiting to deliver the cam card to which the amount of damage would be deposited, and withdrawn the amount of damage, and subsequently, intended to play a role of remitting it to the account designated by the General Book.
1. Fraud;
A. On July 28, 2017, at around 14:30 on the part of the Defendant E and the Victim E, the Defendant’s influencing of his or her nameless telephone in accordance with the aforementioned solicitation against the victim E and the Defendant F (the age of 50) calls to the victim E (the age of 48) or the victim E (the age of 50) for a telephone, and takes the Defendant into custody of the money to the account he or she informed to the Defendant at the time of sending the money. When sending the money, he or she immediately deposits the money to the account he or she informed to the Defendant, he or she will not leave the phone, and he or she transferred the money to the Defendant F’s husband’s credit cooperative account under G’s name to KRW 600,000,000,000 to the Defendant E’s national bank account in the name of I (J).
피해자들의 송금이 완료 된 직후 성명 불상의 총책은 피고인들에게 위챗으로 I 명의의 계좌에 들어 온 피해 금을 인출하여 다른 계좌로 송금하도록 지시하였고, 피고인들은 위 지시에 따라 같은 날 I 명의의 위 계좌에 들어 온 현금 300만 원을 인출하여 번호 불상의 계좌로 송금하였다.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with the employees of Bosing phishing, such as the name and the gross liability, and acquired KRW 12 million from the victims.
B. On July 27, 2017, according to the above conspiracys to the victim K with the above frauds, an infinite telephone inducement policy was made by the victim K.