A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B K7 vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the equivalent) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or the non-accident after an accident).

On February 26, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:58, and proceeded along the three-lane road in front of the white-sea tunnel in the city of Busan, Jin-dong, Busan, along the speed of the 3-lane from the white-sea tunnel to the breadth of the optical-do.

At the time, the location of the vehicle is an intersection with frequent traffic, and the defendant's front side, as the victim C(67) driver's D taxi was in progress, the defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to see the front side well and to keep the safety distance from the front and to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and failed to secure the safety distance, and caused the back panion of the above taxi, which was in the atmosphere of the signal, to the front panion of the passenger car of the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, suffered from the fluoral fumum in need of approximately two weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, avoided the above taxi to the extent that the repair cost of KRW 516,90, such as the exchange of fluor, etc., was damaged to the extent that the above taxi was damaged, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking measures such as providing relief to casualties.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, as seen above, was anticipated that the damaged person would stimulate in the course of escape after the occurrence of the traffic accident, and then, the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle in violation of the instant signal suspending the direct driving direction at the intersection, which is the point where the accident occurred, while driving the vehicle in excess of the said signal, while driving the vehicle in excess of the said signal at the intersection where the accident occurred, and driving the vehicle in excess of the said signal, such as flying the vehicle by

3. On February 26, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and is in Kim Sea-si E around 12:58.