The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced one year and two months to the Defendant, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and the recommended sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee.

When comprehensively considering the conditions of sentencing, the sentencing judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of its discretion in light of the sentencing criteria, the sentencing criteria, etc.

There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.

In addition, even if the circumstances and results of the instant crime were to be considered, the sentence of the lower court is appropriate, and it is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, etc. after the instant crime.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.