logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.07.25 2013노1058
간통
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable in light of the following: (a) the Defendant maintained a state-free sexual relationship with A, who is a woman, thereby causing significant injuries to A’s spouse and their families; (b) the Defendant’s family members consistently denied the instant crime at an investigative agency; and (c) the Defendant did not appear on the date of trial for a considerable period of time on the grounds that the agreement was not reached even though the judgment of the court below was in progress; and (d)

2. According to the records of the instant case, it appears that the inter-conception with a non-prosecutiond A is more likely to occur several times, and the Defendant denies the inter-conception with a investigative agency.

However, the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case since he was charged with the crime of this case for the first time and up to the trial. The defendant who works for a public corporation to maintain his livelihood seems to have been forced to automatically leave his family when the suspended sentence or higher punishment becomes final and conclusive, and thereby, his family would suffer a very great pain. Above all, the defendant was investigated by the police for the charge of attempted rape, etc. from the police, and was paid a agreed amount of 15 million won to A after he was subject to a non-prosecution disposition of this case from the public prosecutor, thereby being investigated into the crime of this case after he was investigated into the crime of this case, which would have been at the workplace after being subject to a non-prosecution disposition of this case from the public prosecutor, and the remaining police investigation that would have been at the workplace, which might have been dismissed. The court below held that the defendant additionally deposited 35 million won for the complainant who is the husband of this case, and there has been a social discussion about the unconstitutionality of the crime of this case, and there are various circumstances such as the motive, motive and circumstances of this case.

arrow