logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.26 2017고정2081
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the B church, and the victim C is a member of the church.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2017. 6. 4. 경 대구 수성구 D, 59호에서 자신의 휴대 전화기를 이용하여, E, F, 피해자 등 총 7명이 있는 카카오 톡 그룹 채팅 방에 피해자를 향해 “ 아무리 막대 먹었기로 이런 쌍 노무 쌔끼 들 100000 쌍 노무 개 누 무 쌍새끼들”, “C 씨 교 회 얼씬 하지 마라 쌍 노 무쌔 끼들 정말 용서가 안되네

Along with posting the word “comforcing”, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by posting the words such as the statement in the list of crimes in attached Form 1.

2. On June 3, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) (Defamation) was using his/her portable phone Doo-gu D and 59, Kakakao Stockholm Group with seven members, including E, F, and Victims, using his/her portable phone, and the fact was that the victimized person embezzled the contribution of the said B church, and that the injured person did not have any relationship with the new church. However, the Defendant did not have any relationship with the new family.

“.......”, “one gregnick Hung Hunglk,” and “C babbag, baged.”

Dr. Dr., in a relationship with Sacheon

Before being held as a pastor, only Twit-gu in charge of public relations about the new subject of lectures shall be the subject of lectures, and there may be several suspicions of suspicions

Along with the fact that the Defendant posted the phrase “(i) why she would have experienced a lot of stories, such as why he/she had a luxa City/Do,” and (ii) up to June 29, 2017, up to June 29, 2017, posted the words such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Table 2 and damaged the honor of the victim by openly disclosing false information through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The contents of a Kakao Stockholm conversation with a photograph taken by the Kakao Stockholm and a Kakao Stockholm conversation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (data submitted from witnesses - Details of the donation for May of the church), investigation reports (statement of witnesses);

1. Criminal facts;

arrow