Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-speed car B.

Around 01:04 on January 17, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car and driven the road of five lanes in front of the D, which is located in the ancient city C, with two lanes from the high-sea complex, the Defendant proceeded at about 84.8km each hour from the high-speed complex to the East International Airport.

At the time, it was difficult to see the front light due to the beam of the headlights of automobiles passing at night, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents and drive safely by accurately operating the front line while complying with the restricted speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant proceeded beyond the restricted speed, neglected the duty of front-time and failed to operate the steering and brakes, caused the death of the victim E (the age of 54) who was a victim E (the age of 54) who was cutting the crosswalk on the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction from the left side of the above vehicle to the front part of the above vehicle, and caused the victim to do so by the shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A corpse of corpse;

1. Written response to the request for appraisal (digital analysis and appraisal);

1. The scene of the accident, vehicle photographs, dead bodies, and clothes photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to blackboxes and CCTV images, field photographs (attached to CDs);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and selection of

1. The defendant and defense counsel's assertion and judgment under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. The gist of the assertion lies in the shocking of the victim while the Defendant was driving at a restricted speed beyond the restricted speed. However, even if the Defendant observed the restricted speed, the above accident could not be avoided. Therefore, the negligence operated by the Defendant beyond the restricted speed and the traffic accident are involved.