Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. From October 19, 2012 to 12:00 to 12:00, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim F, who is the director of the construction site, interfered with the work site of the victim F, over 12 times in total, as indicated in the attached crime list, in a place where the occupation and use of the site for the extension of the meal room of the D High School located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for which the Defendant obtained permission to occupy and use the site for the extension of the meal room in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. Intimidation;

A. At around 11:00 on November 16, 2012, the Defendant threatened the victim F with “I would like to enter the company by calling at the head office if I would like to do so. I would like to attend the company. I would like to attend the school principal by giving her a her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

B. On November 20, 2012, at around 08:54, the Defendant: (a) called the victim F, “I would have been given an opportunity to fthr. He would have ever been paid 1,000 times that he was damaged; (b) would not attend this flicker; (c) I would not attend this flicker; and (d) expressed that I would not attend this flicker.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Each protocol of examination of the accused accused suspect 1 and 2 times (including F substitute part);

1. The police officer's statement 1 and 3 times each;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on obstruction of business;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order.