A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 27, 2018, at the main point of “E” operated by the victim D located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon, the Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim’s main points by force, such as: (a) talking with the victim “E” in the form of “E” to change the victim’s door to close the door of the business establishment from the victim; (b) talking about 10 minutes for the victim; and (c) preventing the victim from opening the door at the entrance of the business establishment.

2. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) at the immediately preceding week, the Defendant 21:14: “A while carrying a horse with alcohol only one person,” the Defendant 12 reported to the captain G and the superintendent of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station F box called to the scene after having been reported 112, carrying out a warning and bath at the police station G and the superintendent of the police station of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station; (b) the Defendant mar the patrol car’s main part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part part of the patrol car on the floor; and (c) the Defendant interfered with the operation of the patrol car because he did not take part of the auxiliary part part part of the patrol car; and (d) continued to walk a buckbuckb

H An assaulting the head flapsing, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The crime of obstructing the execution of official duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act needs to be strictly punished for a crime detrimental to the State’s function by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority. However, the Defendant’s primary offender, the Defendant’s agreement with the victim D, and the Defendant’s depth of mistake while committing the instant crime, shall be taken into account under normal conditions favorable to the Defendant, and the Defendant’s age and age.