Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on June 17, 2008, the Defendant driven a mixed multi-city big car, and proceeded at a speed of about 50km in speed from 0km to e-distance in D in the Sungwon-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seowon-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving duties of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front side and the left side, to accurately operate the steering and the steering system, and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.

However, the defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the left from the right side of the defendant's proceeding direction by negligence in violation of the signal is stated as "the left to the left according to the signal", but the defendant did not prove it, and therefore correct it accordingly.

The upper left side of the G cargo vehicle driven by the victim F (F, South, 34 years old) was received as the front side of the passenger vehicle of the defendant.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim F, such as saves, saves, etc., where the number of days of treatment cannot be known, and the victim H (V, 52 years old), who boarded the Defendant’s vehicle, suffered injury to the saves, saves, etc., where treatment is

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the statutes to reply to an order to submit documents;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against VictimsF with heavier penalty);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not violate the signal at the time. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that they did not violate the signal at the time.