Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 14:40, 2015, the Defendant driven a rocketing car volume, and used three-lanes to the intersection of the hot spring intersection in the Seosung-gu, Daejeon by using three-lanes from the luxal Zone to the luxal Middle School from the luxal Zone.

Since there is a cross-section where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to reduce speed to persons engaged in driving motor vehicles and to prevent accidents by driving motor vehicles safely in accordance with the signals by safely driving motor vehicles in accordance with the signal.

However, by negligence, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal and received the front part of the victim’s vehicle E driving vehicle of the victim D (V, 48 years old) driving on the right side of the vehicle from the right side of the driver’s vehicle, driving vehicle of the victim D (W, 48 years old) driving on the right side of the right side of the road, which was driven by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle to turn to the traffic signal from the front middle school at the right side of the opposite middle school, and received the front part of the driver’s vehicle of the victim F (V, South, 45 years old) driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim D, such as catum and fat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim D, injury to the right H (n, 46 years of age) on the part of the victim E vehicle, such as catum fatum, etc., in the bones of the bones, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F, and injury to the victim I (n, 26 years of age), such as datum fat, fatum, etc., of the bones of the bones of trees, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (victim D and H, each of whom violates the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against the Victim D and H, and the crimes are more severe.