(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.12 2015나8550

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.12 2015나8550

손해배상(자)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

Reasons

1. Basic facts, determination on the change of the principal safety, occurrence and scope of liability for damages, the court's explanation on this part is as follows: "the result of physical examination on the plaintiff's physical examination on the plaintiff's physical examination on the third part"; "the result of physical examination on the old University Hospital Head" in the third part, "the result of physical examination on the old University Head" in the fourth part of the third part, "the result of physical examination on the old University Head" in the fourth part of the first part, "the result of physical examination on the old University Head" in the fourth part, "the result of physical examination on the first part of the first part of the first part of the first instance court" in the fourth part, "the result of the first part of the first part of the first instance court's judgment on the defendant's physical examination on the hospital Head" in the fourth part, "the result of the examination on the second part of the first part of the first part of the first instance court's judgment and the result of the examination on the second part of the first part of the first instance court's judgment on the first part of the first instance court's medical examination".

[Article 10-Class 8 through 11] “The portion used for future medical treatment costs of KRW 1,097,650 (including plastic surgery and radars for the reflectr of the operation in the light of the light, and KRW 1,450,000 is required as the cost of the operation. There is no evidence that such disbursement was made by the date of the closing of argument in the trial, and thus, the disbursement on September 18, 2015 is deemed to have been made on the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial, and the interim interest shall be deducted.

A person shall be appointed.

2. Conclusion.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제402조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2016.09.22 2015나2073638

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.15 2015나14661

-서울고등법원 2015.09.03 2014나2050478

-대전지방법원천안지원 2016.11.24 2015가단106710

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.10 2017나16081