logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.08.26 2015구단60702
국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 요건비해당 처분 취소
Text

1. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant committed against the Plaintiff on July 10, 2015, in relation to the “physical (pappropin escape certificate)” and the “mal (marithal pathal chronism)”.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 9, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was transferred to supplemental service on October 18, 2012, and was dismissed on July 2, 2013, and filed an application for registration with the Defendant on September 23, 2013 on the basis of “kno, hand, hum, hum, hum, and head” as the applicant for registration of persons of distinguished service to the State.

B. The Defendant recognized that “The second half half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, the first half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, and the second half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, the second half of the steel frame, and the second half of the steel frame,” “The status after the finite cinite c

C. On December 5, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an additional application for registration with the Defendant. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision that “The Defendant does not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State” on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation as to the Plaintiff’s “the 2nd double-water dives of the coordinate, the upper left-hand hives of hives of hives, the upper left-hand hives of hives of hives, the hives of hives of hives of hives of hives, the left-hand hives of hives of hives of hives of hives, the upper-hand hives of hives of hives of hives of hives of hives of hives of hives of hives.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 4, Eul 1 through 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not have an escape certificate before entering the Plaintiff, but it was unreasonable to go through a training for rapidly moving with heavy scarcitys, etc. as a soldier after entering the Plaintiff, and in particular, in the process of preparing a briefing contest, it was caused by an escape certificate when changing the area of the horse and moving incidental equipment.

Therefore, it constitutes a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran's compensation.

arrow