(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2019.01.24 2018가합10390

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2019.01.24 2018가합10390

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants’ respective 62,172,250 won and each of the said money to the Plaintiffs annually from January 22, 2018 to January 24, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The net G was married to and under the chain with H, and was divorced on January 10, 2004, and completed a marriage report with H on May 21, 2013.

B. On January 22, 2018, from around 17:40 to 18:30, the network G was driven by the network C on the backwards of the passenger car he driven by the network and was driven by the network C, operated by the network C, in Youngcheon City, to the K in J. The passenger car driven by the network G was placed on the reservoir, and the network C was broken away, but the network G was found to have died within the passenger car.

C. On February 14, 2018, the fact that the deceased C was investigated by an investigative agency on the suspicion that he/she murdered the deceased G, and was prosecuted by the Daegu District Court 2018Rahap60 on the charge that he/she murdered the deceased C, and the prosecution against the deceased C was concluded on March 26, 2018.

The plaintiffs are the children of the network G, who are the successors of the network G, and the defendants are the children of the network C, and they are the successors of the network C.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 3 through 5, Evidence No. 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The main point of the plaintiffs' assertion was that the deceased C murdered the deceased G while committing suicide. As such, the Defendants, the heir of the deceased C, are liable to compensate the plaintiffs, the heir of the deceased G, for the damages caused by the tort that the deceased C killed the deceased G.

3. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The following facts are acknowledged in addition to the evidence, evidence No. 2-1, evidence No. 2-3, evidence No. 8-10, evidence No. 14, evidence No. 15-1 through No. 9, evidence No. 15-1, No. 2, evidence No. 2-1, and evidence No. 2-2 prior to the facts of recognition.

1 The network G and the network C frequently discussed the issue of payment of ordinary living expenses, the problem of transfer of the net C's property, etc.

In this process, the net C assaulted the net G, and on October 26, 2017, he assaulted the net G and gave approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2017.03.03 2016가단50220

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.04.03 2018나43448

-광주지방법원해남지원 2019.04.24 2018가합3490

-부산지방법원동부지원 2020.11.05 2020가단210305

-서울북부지방법원 2015.06.11 2013가합22199