In the order of the defendant, among the 36,300 square meters of land in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the defendant has each point in the attached drawings No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1.

1. In full view of the purport of the pleadings as to the entries and videos set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 10, the plaintiff sold to the defendant on April 17, 2007 the plaintiff's lineal landscape D forest No. 61,00,000,000 won in the river No. 61,00 in the river No. 36,300 square meters in the river No. 36,300 square meters in the river No. 36,000 in the river No. 36, and the defendant purchased 300 square meters in the above land and agreed that the defendant is responsible for all of the interest equipment and expenses to the Ri No. 3. 3,000 in the above land No. 1,2,3,4,100 among the above land No. 3. Accordingly, although the plaintiff successively connected the above land No. 991,73 square meters in order (hereinafter "the land of this case"), it can be acknowledged that the defendant transferred ownership to the land of this case.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer of the land of this case in accordance with the agreement dated April 17, 2007 to the plaintiff.

B. The plaintiff is the defendant's above.

Although it is argued that the Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 60,00,000 in the event that the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of this case is not completed, it is insufficient to recognize that the entries of evidence Nos. 2, 12-1, 2, and 13 alone in each of the above documents are sufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 60,000. However, the Plaintiff’s claim for this part of

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.