A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 14:55 on June 29, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant interfered with the victim’s taxi business by force by obstructing the progress of the said taxi for about 20 minutes, such as blocking the passage of the said taxi in front of the said taxi and leaving the said taxi five times a week, in the front door of the said taxi, on the ground that the Defendant was driven by the victim D on the ground that he did not get a taxi in front of the “Csari” located in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si.

2. The Defendant publicly insulting the victim F, who was a police officer upon receipt of a report at the date, time, and place mentioned in paragraph (1) and was dispatched, by openly insulting the victim, such as “Chewing, gring, and gring out to the victim in a large manner,” at the location where the victim F, who was a police officer, tried to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender with a large number of persons who reported the defect, who committed a crime interfering with his/her duties.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (in light of the fact that there are many departments of violence, the case is relatively heavy, and the present state of health is not good);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;