logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.07.23 2013가단32712
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 2013, G was received from the Defendant on June 1, 2013 (hereinafter “instant construction”) the rainwater collection and roof glaps of the instant building on the HH ground in Kim Jong-si (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. G employed Plaintiff A and engaged in melting work during the instant construction. While Plaintiff A was engaged in glocking work on June 8, 2013, Plaintiff A was in the glocking work, the glock structure was attached to hand in order to prevent the glocking of the above glock to the roof opposite to the above building. However, Plaintiff A fell on the floor, which was installed at the end of the above building, suffered from injury, such as glickening glock, etc. (hereinafter “the instant accident”), and was in an unknown state.

C. Plaintiff B’s wife, Plaintiff C, D, and E are children of Plaintiff A.

【Ground for recognition】 There is no dispute

2. Determination as to the claim

A. The plaintiff's claim 1) The defendant or the defendant's husband I neglected to give specific instructions to G and the plaintiff's husband about the progress and implementation method of the construction of this case. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case. 2) The defendant is the owner of the building of this case, and the building of this case was established with the building of this case on the roof side. Since the construction of this case is mainly conducted on the roof side, the construction of this case is likely to fall on the roof side of the construction of this case, and there is a risk that when G or the plaintiff Gap falls on the roof side of the construction of this case, the construction of this case is likely to fall on the roof side of the building, and thus, the plaintiff A is obliged to take protective measures such as removal of the head, etc. in the plan for the establishment and implementation of the above DNA, and thus the defendant is liable to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

B. First of all, the judgment is to the Defendant.

arrow