The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles)

A. As to the insult, the Defendant was not the victim but at the scene.

C It is the same words as the facts charged in this part of the indictment.

B. As to intimidation, the Defendant did not have made the victim feel the same remarks as indicated in this part of the facts charged, and even if so, made such remarks.

Even if it does not fall under the notification of harm, a crime of intimidation is not established.

2. The following circumstances, i.e., why the court below duly admitted and investigated the evidence, i.e., why the victim first talks about the reporter and the details of the report after receiving the 112 report from the court of the court below and sending it to the site.

On the other hand, it is possible to take a bath for the victim and to punish him/her.

Although the defendant made a removal, the defendant continued to take a bath for the victim.

In addition, one defendant will die, and if he is punished, he will not leave his family.

In full view of the fact that the Defendant made a statement of contents, ③ the victim, who is a police officer, appears to have no particular reason to file a complaint against the Defendant, and the fact that the Defendant made a threat to the victim by insulting the victim and informing him of specific harm is sufficiently recognized by taking account of the following: (a) the Defendant, even if he was a woman, could have piracy to his family by various means; and (b) the witness at the site who reported 112 report in dispute with the Defendant, expressed his desire to dispatch the police; and (c) the Defendant made a statement of contents, and (d) the victim, who is a police officer, appears to have no specific reason to file a complaint against the Defendant.