logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.09.09 2014구합1392
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. On January 27, 2014, the Central Labor Relations Commission rendered relief for unfair dismissal between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor.

Reasons

1. The circumstances leading to the decision on reexamination of this case

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was established on March 11, 1989 and employs approximately 140 full-time workers and operates a broadcasting business related to Buddhist, etc. The Plaintiff was employed by the Intervenor as the reporter on November 1, 1989 and served as the Director General of the Report from December 1, 2008 to July 12, 2012. From December 16, 2012, 2012, the Intervenor was employed as the person working as the visitor of the government-type government office.

B. The Plaintiff, while serving as the Director General of the Report Bureau from July 2010 to October 201, the Plaintiff was holding concurrently the team leader of the Museum, and took overall charge of all practical affairs concerning the conclusion of various contracts, accounts, and financing management of musical projects. 2) On July 14, 2010, the Intervenor entered into a joint production contract with the Cultural Broadcasting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “MBC”) and MMT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “MMMMT”) with the musical community with the Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “MMMMT”), while taking charge of the total production cost of KRW 1.6 billion, KRW 200,000,000,000 among the total production cost of KRW 3.2 billion, KRW 1.1 billion, KRW 200,000,000,000,000.

3) An intervenor, an incorporated association, around July 2010, is referred to as D (hereinafter “D”).

(4) On June 10, 201, the Intervenor entered into a modified agreement to delete the content that the amount of the funds and profits distributed after settlement is the revenue of the Intervenor, including the content that the funds and profits are the revenue of the Intervenor. 4) On June 10, 201, the Intervenor entered into a revised agreement to delete the content that the funds and profits are the revenue of the Intervenor.

5 The Intervenor paid to D total sum of KRW 470,000,000,000,000 after the amendment of the investment agreement, with the musical support of musical C, and KRW 4770,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. On July 8, 2011, the Intervenor paid KRW 300,000,000,00,000 from E Foundation, under the name of cooperation.

C. Whether the dismissal of the instant case was subject to guidance

1. With respect to the implementation of investment agreements with intervenors around July 2010, it is unilaterally unfavorable to intervenors.

arrow