A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years and one year and six years of imprisonment for fraud in the Credit Support of Suwon Friwon, and the Defendant terminated the execution of the sentence on April 6, 2010.

On January 15, 2015, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months for fraud, etc. at a means of flooding, and has been sentenced to the same year.

4. 23. The judgment became final and conclusive.

around September 30, 2011, the Defendant purchased KRW 193,00,000,000 from Gyeonggi-do E Forest E, Gyeonggi-do, and KRW 658 square meters of forest land and KRW 549,00,000,000,000 for KRW 193,000,000, and did not pay the intermediate payment and the balance to D, the facts charged in the facts charged in the above land were omitted once. However, according to the evidence, the Defendant attempted to deceiving the Defendant into selling the part of KRW 549,00,00 in forest land (hereinafter “instant land”) that is deemed to have sold once the facts charged in the above crime and to acquire the purchase price by deception.

On October 22, 2011, the Defendant agreed to sell the instant land to the said victim for KRW 200 million at a building site office located in Gyeonggi-si H, Gyeonggi-gu, and said that the purchase of the instant land by the victim may bring profit to the lease of the land at a pre-sale rate. As such, the Defendant would immediately transfer the ownership and construct the instant land.

However, in fact, the provisional registration of the right to demand the transfer of ownership in the name of 330 square meters among the instant land was established, and the Defendant was required to pay interest equivalent to KRW 20 million every month from the bond business operator by lending KRW 1.3 billion from the bond business operator while running the land development and sale business, and thus, the above provisional registration was cancelled, and the intermediate payment and balance was paid to D, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victim to construct the instant land on that ground by paying the intermediate payment and balance to D.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and concludes a real estate sales contract with the victim as above.