Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of violating the Presidential Emergency Decree shall be acquitted. The assembly and demonstration among the facts charged in the instant case.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant violated the presidential emergency measures is a member of the ISIE located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant resolved to criticize and criticize the complaints against the unclaimed student from the end of December 1, 1977 to the end of February 1, 1978, and, from February 1, 1978 to May 5, 197, prepared a draft of the declaration stating that he criticizes the body of remains and claims the necessity of a new democratic constitution, and then, on the 24th day of the same month, the Defendant distorted the current political system and reality, distorted the facts about the current political system and reality, and slandered the Constitution of the Republic of Korea by expressive materials, and claimed the abolition thereof.

B. The Assembly and Demonstration Act (amended by Act No. 3278 of Dec. 20, 1973; hereinafter referred to as the "former Assembly and Demonstration Act") is referred to as the "former Assembly and Demonstration Act".

On September 12, 1978, the fact that the authorities concerned with the violation do not comply with the commitment to release persons related to the Jeonju Demonstration among the participants of the National Youth Education Meeting, with the intention of attempting to offer an illegal demonstration in the Jeonju on September 12, 1978;

4. On the 4. The assembly and demonstration in violation of the democratic basic order of the Constitution, such as the attendance at the Human Rights Council of the Ma religious organization Youth Republic of Korea held in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and the expression of advertisement, such as “the head of the Gu in front place”, “the head of the police station and the head of the Do and the head of the Do and the head of the Do and the head of the Do.” and “the head of the Do and the head of the Do in front place,” and “the head of the Do and the head of the Do and the head of the Do in front place.”

2. According to the records of this case, the Seoul Criminal Court rendered a judgment of November 18, 1978, which found the defendant guilty of all the charges, five years of imprisonment and suspension of qualification against the defendant.