logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.01.25 2016구단54780
공무상요양기간연장(불승인)부결 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 22, 2008, the Plaintiff served as a police officer belonging to the Busan Urban Police Station. On May 22, 2008, when called out to the scene of a crime and searched, the Plaintiff was faced with a wall lower than 2 meters. On February 25, 2010, the Plaintiff was faced with an accident of suffering from an injury on the wind, where he was unable to find accurate points of arrival due to the accurate outbreak. On February 25, 2010, the Plaintiff obtained from the Defendant the approval of medical care for the total period from July 28, 2010 to October 4, 2010 after obtaining the approval of medical care for the occupational injury on the part of the Busan Urban Police Station, the right stroke, the right stroke, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part, the upper part of which was accompanied by the stroke, and other conical signboards (the escape evidence).

B. On March 2, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for approval for the extension of the period of medical care for official duties with an injury or disease caused by a disaster on the part of June 24, 2015 to July 8, 2015 (4 days), from August 3, 2015 to September 30, 2015 (4 days), from October 8, 2015 to November 24, 2015 (5 days), and from December 14, 2015 to February 29, 2016 (5 days).

C. On March 21, 2016, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition on the extension of the period of medical care due to official duties with the content that the Plaintiff did not approve the Plaintiff’s application according to the Defendant’s advisory opinion (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 3-1, Gap evidence 3-3, Gap evidence 4-7, the purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff received the approval of medical care and the extension of the period of medical care, but still did not completely recover or improve the approved injury and disease, and continued medical treatment is required for the relief, cure, and reduction of recurrence of the approved injury and disease. Therefore, the Plaintiff received additional medical treatment during the above period.

arrow