A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, an insurance solicitor of the “E”, which is an insurance agency operated by D in Ilyang-dong B B building C, was provided with IDs and passwords available for access to F’s exclusive insurance planners from D and processed the personal information of customers. While entering a random serial number from the accident receipt item of the above site, the Defendant became aware of the fact that he/she can identify the relevant driver’s name, resident registration number, address, contact address, automobile insurance subscription details, etc., by accessing the above site as if it is necessary for insurance design, even though the Defendant did not have any right to obtain personal information by means of such method, and then became aware of the driver’s personal information, as seen above, was connected to the above site as if it is necessary for the business of insurance design, and received allowances by entering the insurance company’s personal information in the estimate item of the premium comparison of the above site, and sending text messages and text messages to the driver and mail, and concluded an insurance contract with the driver who contacted him/her.

Around August 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) accessed the Defendant’s residence in G, using a computer installed therein, accessed the said F’s exclusive insurance solicitor site; (b) identified H’s name, resident registration number, contact number, etc. by inputting a random number into the accident receipt item; and (c) acquired and used personal information by means of the same method, including sending the personal information to H as text messages, from March 9, 2015 to November 5, 2018, from March 9, 2015 to November 5, 2018, by entering the details of the insurance premium calculated by inputting the personal information into the relevant comparative estimate site.

Accordingly, the defendant, who managed or managed personal information, acquired personal information by improper means.