1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

2. The plaintiff asserts that, in the case of return to Pakistan in the trial of the party, the plaintiff is placed in a clear situation where it would be subject to violence, intimidation, etc. from the muslim suslim that newly suslimins the Islamicus. Thus, the plaintiff asserts that there is a fear that the plaintiff has sufficient grounds for suffering from persecution in Pakistan, a country of nationality, has been recognized.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the religious policy, judicial system, and public order of Pakistan admitted by the evidence adopted by the first instance court cited earlier; (b) the specific content and character of the Plaintiff’s his/her argument; (c) the Plaintiff’s entry route; (d) the period from entry and departure to refugee application; and (e) the details of the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status, etc., there is no sufficient fear to deem that the Plaintiff’s statement on the situation of his

According to the data submitted by the Plaintiff, there is a social atmosphere that hostiles the flag in Pakistan, and some terrorist incidents against the flags also have been reported. However, this is not a general issue, but a case that does not seem to be a social issue due to a news report.

Even according to the assertion itself, the plaintiff does not constitute a leader of a shot school, etc. who conducts a speech and behavior to pay attention to the general shot school.

It is difficult to readily conclude that the Plaintiff is unable to receive the minimum personal protection from the authorities, if the Plaintiff returns to Pakistan only on the basis of vague concerns.

According to this, the plaintiff's assertion is not accepted.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed as there is no ground.