1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

[Supplementary Decision] The Plaintiff asserts that “The Plaintiff is faced with a situation in which she could be subject to terrorism from Magboni Cult member B and its daily day, which is a non-political organization of the Republic of Korea.” However, in full view of the state situation and religious composition of the Republic of Korea, the contents of relevant international reports, the Plaintiff’s entry route, the period from entry into and departure from the Republic of Korea, and the details of refugee applications, etc., acknowledged by the evidence adopted by the first instance court, there is no sufficient fear to deem that the Plaintiff is likely to be subject to persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion. There is no objective evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that the Plaintiff is threatened by an organization of Magboni Cult, and there is no possibility that the Plaintiff might be considered as grounds for recognition of refugee status.” However, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff could be considered as grounds for recognition of refugee status in the pertinent region of the Republic of Korea cannot be seen as her age.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable in conclusion as above.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed because it is without merit.