Text
1.The judgment of the first instance, including a claim modified in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer for reasons of sale on February 8, 1978, No. 2370 of the receipt of February 16, 1978, with respect to the Gu Government District Court’s 1,140 square meters (hereinafter “1 land”) in Gu Government-si.
B. On September 19, 1990, the Plaintiff was engaged in the business of construction of reinforced concrete, and the Defendant and the Defendant are set forth in the following subparagraph 2:
B. 2) As seen in paragraph (a) of the attached Form 1 among the lands listed in paragraph (1), the sum of the area of 600 square meters in the ship (A), which is connected in sequence with each of the items of 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 14 of the attached Form 1 among the lands listed in paragraph (a), and the area of 158 square meters in the land adjacent to the land (a) and the area of 600 square meters in the ship (a) (a) and the area of 158 square meters in the Gu-si, Gu-si (a) adjacent to the land (a) and Gu-si, 158 square meters in the area (a) (hereinafter referred to as “230 square meters in the above land”; and (b) each of the above land was leased to the Defendant for 3,000,000 won in each of the lease contract (hereinafter referred to below).
(c) Korea completed the registration of initial ownership on the land No. 65576 of receipt on November 23, 1995 with respect to the land No. 2.
On December 19, 2013, the Plaintiff: “The Plaintiff occupied and used the second land from December 20, 2008 to October 30, 2013 without a loan agreement; thus, the Plaintiff imposed KRW 40,759,610 of the State Property Act and Article 71 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, based on Article 72 of the State Property Act and Article 71 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and voluntarily ordering the restoration of the said land within a prompt period of time after restitution.”