The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

1. At around 17:00 on March 10, 2013, the Defendant found the Defendant’s backline D, E, and victim F (at the age of 61) at the Defendant’s residence in the north-gu Office C building operation 310, and committed an assault with the victim’s head knife with his hand on the part of the Defendant, while the Defendant was in a dispute with D and the victim F.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not assault the victim.

3. The recognition of facts constituting an offense in a criminal trial ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value, which makes a judge not to have any reasonable doubt. Thus, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to fully reach the extent that such conviction would lead to such a conviction, even if the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant, even if there is suspicion of guilt, such as where the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.

As evidence corresponding to the facts charged in this case, there are statements from the victim and the victim F, who are the births of the victim.

However, it is difficult to believe that the statements of the victim and the F are in trust, as follows.

(1) At the time of accusation, the victim stated clearly on March 10, 2013 at the police station the date on which the assault of this case occurred, and then the prosecution is the prosecution.

3.3.In the case;

3. 5. 사이에 있었던 것 같다고 하였고, 경찰에서는 피고인에게 D의 흉을 본 사실을 따지자 피고인이 피해자에게 “너가 그랬잖아”라고 하며 욕설을 하면서 폭행을 하였다고 하였다가 검찰에서는 D의 흉을 보았느냐 아니냐로 서로 따지다가 피고인이 피해자에게 나이값을 하라며 형제들끼리 나눠 갖기로 한 돈을 가지고 가더라도 쓸 것도 없다고 하면서 일어나 폭행을 하였다고 하였으며, 경찰에서는 뺨을 때리고...