beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On April 8, 2014, at around 11:40, the Defendant used assault from the victim D (the age of 60) on the front side of the Fdong of the C building in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and assaulted the victim by booming the flab.
2. The judgment of the Defendant denies the facts charged by denying that he was engaged in assaulting D, and that he was engaged in the flapsing of D only once, and that he was not engaged in the flapsing of D.
As shown in the facts charged, there are D's legal statement, the police interrogation protocol of D about D, the police protocol of D preparation, the police protocol of E, the photograph and the diagnosis document.
First, in relation to D's legal statement, police statement, and written statement, D stated that since the police, up to this court, the Defendant she had flicked himself in the train, and she did not assault her at all. In addition, the police stated that he she had flicked her after he she flicked her, followed her, followed her body by drinking her, and followed her body.
However, the statements of D are completely different from the facts charged in the instant case, such as the process, place, and content of flapsing.
In addition, the statement in this court is not consistent because it did not make any statement about the fact that it was made by the police, that is, it was made by additional assault, such as complying with the defendant's return.
In addition, D is issued and confirmed by a summary order based on the fact that he inflicted an injury on the Defendant at the time of the instant case. According to the witness E’s testimony and photograph, D, even though it is acknowledged that D inflicted an injury upon the victim at the time of the instant case, it is difficult for D to believe D’s statement as it is, since D did not have any fact of assaulting the Defendant, and rather, did so.
Next, upon considering the E’s written statement of the police, E stated that D was at the police time her bucked with his her buck and bridged with one another, but the contents of the statement were balped with “the contents of the statement.”