logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.03.15 2018나2047524
사해행위 취소등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case in this case are as follows: from the end of the judgment of the first instance to the end of the judgment; from the end of the judgment of the first instance to the “debt”; from the end of the third to the end of the third to the “debt”; from the end of the fourth to the end of the third to the “court of the first instance”; from the end of the third to the end of the sixth to the “court of the first instance”; from the end of the fourth to the “instant case”; from the end of the second to the “court of the first instance”; from the end of the fourth to the “court of the first instance”; from the end of the first instance to the “court of the first instance”; and from the addition of the judgment in the next trial to the lower court,

2. Even if based on all the evidence submitted by the Defendant up to the trial of the lower court, it is not sufficient to view that the claim in this case was transferred to the Defendant, or that the Defendant was bona fide at the time of transfer of the claim in this case, as the sole measure to promote rehabilitation by co-defendant B of the first instance trial, or that the Defendant’s argument in the grounds for appeal against this is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow