The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Around November 15, 2013, the summary of the facts charged: (a) around June 2013, the Defendant: (b) required an employee who could not know his/her name at the “E judicial scrivener office” located in Busan Seo-gu, Busan to unilaterally cancel the registration of chonsegwon (right to lease on a deposit basis) through the law firm G office without the consent of the complainant; (c) required a thorough investigation and punishment; (d) to prepare a false statement stating the false facts; (b) around that time, the Defendant submitted the above statement to a police officer who was unable to know his/her name at 319,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

However, on June 2012, the Defendant consented to the cancellation of the registration of chonsegwon established in the name of the Defendant as above and consented to the preparation of proxy form in the name of the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant was arrested by F with the aim of having F punished criminal punishment.

2. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction should be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, so long as there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2001Do2823, Aug. 21, 2001). First, examining the overall purport of the Defendant’s complaint in light of the record, the Defendant’s request by F.F.