1. The Defendant’s KRW 62,272,72 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 25, 2015 to August 14, 2019, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company aimed at the manufacturing business of sound and glass products, and the defendant is a company that aims at electrical construction business, etc.

B. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant received a contract for electrical construction from the Korea Electric Power Corporation, and carried out high voltage electrical construction at the “C high voltage electrical station” located near the Plaintiff’s factory, and performed high voltage electrical construction, and even if high voltage electric wires were cut off to construction, the Defendant cut the electric wires while connecting by each electric cable so that electricity can continuously flow (hereinafter “instant accident”). However, the Defendant cut the electric wires without connecting the bypass cable, and caused a string of the three-round electric power (hereinafter “instant accident”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including branch numbers if there are branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of this court's response to the order of submission of documents to D Co., Ltd., the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's assertion 1) Among the machinery inside the plaintiff's factory due to the accident of this case, ① the compact presses and parts of machinery, and the gathering and electric control equipment, ② the reinforcement road (hereinafter "the strengthening road of this case").

(3) The two sides of the instant case, hereinafter referred to as “the two sides of the instant case”).

(1) Among them, the repair cost was paid from E on January 29, 2016 in relation to the items, but the repair cost was not paid in relation to the reinforcement of the instant building and the removal of glass processing. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for the repair cost of KRW 190,000,000 for the reinforcement of the instant building and the repair cost of the two angles of the instant building, and KRW 33,440,00 for the repair cost of the two angles of the instant building. 2) The Defendant’s assertion that there was an accident in the instant case that did not cause damage to other electric equipment than the power equipment, and if there was a non-electric power supply system (UPS) or a fluoral protection system, the reinforcement of the instant building and the damage to both sides.