1. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claims added at the trial.

1. The contents and amount of the defendant's tort alleged by the specific plaintiff in the trial are as follows.

On January 19, 2016, the defendant accused the plaintiff on the charge of violating the National Security Act with the false content of "the plaintiff, who had an influent idea that North Korea C should make South Korea a hostile unification, who publicly refuse to take a national policy together with D, encourage, praise, and encourage North Korea as an anti-government organization, and expressed the guidance and capital of this country as a perjury together with D," in order to intentionally detain the plaintiff.

Each defamation case: (a) The Defendant spreaded a question that the Plaintiff received KRW 100 million from the Korea Air Co., Ltd.; (b) stated that “the Plaintiff is not detained, but will be detained,” “I will immediately be detained,” and “I will come into force for three years,” and “I will have gone into force for three years.”

A case of embezzlement complaint: The defendant filed a false complaint that the plaintiff embezzled public funds for the Internet car page.

Although the content of the notice of civil judgment corresponds to the assertion of "defacing" acts, it is different from this.

The defendant posted a civil judgment (Seoul District Court 2001Kahap25301) in the case of damages claim filed by the plaintiff on the Internet car page.

The claim amount: 5,00,000 won, which is a part of the total of 19,000,000 won for the above illegal acts, and damages for delay shall be claimed.

[Plaintiff, as above, did not specify the amount of consolation money claimed by each claim and the amount of partial claim, as it combines the damages claims due to the following two acts. Thus, it is deemed that the plaintiff claims part of the claim by asserting equal amount for each claim.