logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.12.15 2013나12924
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged in the first instance court by the Plaintiff for the acceptance of the judgment by the first instance court are not significantly different from the contents alleged in the first instance court, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance court are examined, the judgment by the first instance court is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “89,498,708 won” in the future treatment expenses of No. 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance each of “4,340,600 won” and “54,340,600 won” and “4,340,600 won” are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the part of the first instance is used as follows. As such, it shall be accepted pursuant to the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. 3. As long as the part used as of February 1, 200 and only a part of the claim is claimed, res judicata effect of the final and conclusive judgment extends to the remaining part of the claim, and thus, the remaining part may not be separately claimed. However, if it is expressly stated that the final and conclusive judgment on certain claims is a part of the claim, the remaining part of the claim should be examined by specifying that the remaining part of the claim is part of the claim.

arrow