logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고단3001
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for six months, and for four months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for fraud at the Gwangju District Court on August 29, 2014 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gwangju District Court on June 1, 2015, and on August 8, 2017, the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 17, 2017 after being sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the same crime in the same court on August 8, 2017.

1. Defendant A and B (the top 3001 order 2017 order order 3001) suggested that Defendant A would not have had a certain occupation and thus, Defendant A would not have any cost of living at the time of July 2016, and that Defendant B would be punished for money by inserting an article on the Internet bulletin board and receiving money from the purchaser, and not sending the money, and Defendant B accepted this.

As a result, Defendant A puts an article on the Internet “A” website or game-related website on sales of game items or game money, Defendant B puts an article on the Internet “Nber Highest Country” website, and Defendant A sent an article on sales of goods on the Internet website. Defendant A sent an article to a buyer who reported and contacted with the buyer, and the buyer wishes to have a telephone call, and then the buyer sent money to the designated account by receiving Defendant B’s telephone, if the buyer transferred money to the designated account.

Defendant

B on October 23, 2016, 2016, puts on the Internet “Neber High Republic of Korea” a word “J” selling one back-to-date on the website of “Neber High Republic of Korea,” and Defendant A falsely stated that the above sales text would be sent to the victim G who sent 150,000 won to the text message.

However, the Defendants did not have a wing so even if they received money from the victim G because they did not have a wing, they did not have the intention or ability to sell the wing.

The Defendants, as above, by deceiving the victim G, received 150,000 won from the victim G to the account (K) of Defendant B’s bank account around October 24, 2016.

arrow