1. Defendant B’s KRW 2,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from March 18, 2016 to April 1, 2020, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, as a teacher of Seoul D Elementary School, led students to the E Training Center operated by Defendant B (hereinafter “instant training center”). On March 18, 2016, the Plaintiff was addicted to the said training center (hereinafter “instant accident”), along with F, etc., an assistant principal, at a level of 7:50 p.m., around July 18, 2016.

B. At the time, the Plaintiff: (a) 10 to 15 minutes of smelled in the instant hot-water room from the hot-water room; (b) 22:26:19 was reported on the same day; and (c) 23:14 on the same day, the Plaintiff moved to Seoul National University Hospital on the same day.

C. The Plaintiff received related medical treatment at the emergency room of Seoul National University Hospital, and COHB was transferred from 19.6 to 3.0, and the Plaintiff was discharged from a new wall on March 19, 2016 when there was no special symptoms.

The Plaintiff was determined to grant approval for medical treatment for official duties for a total of 1,404 days from March 19, 2016 to January 22, 2019 due to the instant accident.

E. Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is an insurer who has concluded a liability insurance for training facilities using the instant training center as an insurance subject matter with Defendant B.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim, etc.

A. It is clear that the plaintiff alleged in the plaintiff's assertion was suffering from the addiction to the carbon in the training center of this case, and the plaintiff received for a long time the treatment of toxic cerebral cerebral Bribery, etc. Accordingly, the defendant B is the owner or manager of the training center of this case, and the defendant C is liable to pay consolation money for mental suffering to the plaintiff as the insurer, and the delay damages.

B. The evidence and Gap's Nos. 4, 7, and 7, as mentioned above, as to the claim against the defendant B.