logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.01.08 2013구합2185
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of refusal to grant medical care to the Plaintiff on August 5, 2013 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 14, 2012, when the Plaintiff was employed by B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Nonindicted Company”) on January 15, 1990, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by Cental Health Doctors as “Sule Eule Eule Eule Eule Eulde of Middle-do” on September 14, 2012, and on December 27, 2012 at the Yangsan National University Hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “Eule Maule and Major Eule (hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury”).

B. On March 27, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for medical care benefits for the instant injury and disease to the Defendant. However, on August 5, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant injury and the Plaintiff’s business.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1, 3-1, Eul evidence 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion occurred due to frequent changes in duties, forced transfer to Busan oil reservoir and unfair disciplinary action on the grounds of absence from work, salary class and promotional omission and performance rate, etc., coercion of Nonparty Company’s trade union to submit a pledge of non-party company’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-party trade union’s non-

B. The facts of recognition 1) The plaintiff entered the non-party company on January 15, 1990 and worked as a device driving guide from the Arabic production department and the Arabic production department until February 1995, and was in charge of assistance in the operation of petrochemicals (BTX) production process from February 15, 1995 to May 198.

arrow