logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.05.21 2019고단1936
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has been employed as a mobile phone sales employee at Csan branch in Changwon-si C Co., Ltd. located in Changwon-si B from the end of November 2015 to November 2017.

The defendant, taking advantage of his position as a sales employee, thought that he had sold his mobile phone using another person's name, and even though he did not have the intention or ability to have another person use his mobile phone normally, he used another person's personal identification card or used another person's personal identification card to open his mobile phone in order to obtain fees for the sale of his mobile phone and mobile phone from the radio operator.

On January 13, 2017, the Defendant voluntarily prepared an application for mobile phone joining KRW 88,640,000, monthly payment at the above CMasan Branch using the name of D for 30 months, and received one device “Aphone7” from the victim E, which is equivalent to KRW 99,90,00 at the market price.

In addition, the Defendant received fees from the victim according to the records of the cell phone terminal and the cell phone opening performance in the amount of KRW 7,156,600 from the victim by preparing and submitting an application for joining another person's cell phone in total at least six times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. A criminal suspect who has filed each application for membership, a copy of the investigation report (in relation to telephone conversations and failure to conduct a survey on telephone conversations with witness D), a criminal investigation report (in relation to telephone conversations with witness D), a criminal investigation report (in relation to the confirmation of the contents of Kakao Stockholm of witness D and a text photo attached), an investigation report (in relation to the request of A for payment of unpaid amount of the identity theft), a criminal investigation report (in relation to the investigation documents attached to public inspection documents), a criminal investigation report (in relation to the adjustment of the details of the identity theft by number, details of compensation, attachment of reply data), a criminal investigation report (in relation to the statement of

arrow