1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasons why the court should explain the instant case by admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. Paragraph (3) is the same as the part of the judgment of the court of first instance (including the attached Form) in addition to the part which the defendant determines as to the argument that the court made in this court. Thus, it is citing it by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(2) The judgment of the court of first instance, which rejected the Defendant’s assertion, is justifiable in rejecting the Defendant’s assertion, on the grounds that the Defendant appealed while filing an appeal, is not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and all the evidence submitted in the court of first instance was examined). On the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance regarding “the provisional seizure of real estate of this case” in Articles 4, 18, and 6, 5,

The 5th sentence of the first instance judgment, the 13th to 15th sentence, shall be completed as follows.

As each objection was filed against the provisional seizure of real estate in the instant case, the Daejeon District Court 2016Kadan50764 of the provisional seizure of real estate in the instant case was revoked on May 31, 2017 ( Daejeon District Court 2017Kadan50391), and the Daejeon District Court 2016Kadan52715 of the provisional seizure of real estate was revoked on June 2, 2017 (Seoul District Court 2017Kadan50390 of the Daejeon District Court 2017).

On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, "Plaintiff B" in the 20th sentence shall be applied to "Plaintiff B".

Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, " until September 25, 2013" in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied "by September 5, 2013".

Each “(1) through (4)” at the lower end of the first instance judgment on the 12th page of the judgment: Provided, That the lower level of the lower level was written by cutting the “turg” into “a box as requested by the Plaintiffs.”

The Defendant’s assertion F that the additional decision was made was made by leasing KRW 2,686,00,000 to D under the agreement on August 20, 2013, and then leasing KRW 2,686,00,00 from J, a joint guarantor, the debtor’s surety, on December 31, 2013.